Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Moderators: VelvetGeorge, BUG
- vanhalen5150
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:13 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Halifax, Canada
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
From what I'm understanding with the piano, looking at just a single string and playing the major scale straight up that, you then play the shape of the designated mode in the order it falls. This would be the mode for whichever key you started in. Lot of memorization in this. I think it takes time to really get it down. This ain't "Smoke on the water" like your neighbor showed you..."put your fingers here...then go heeeerre...now go up heeeere...then back to heeeere"
- Attachments
-
- captain-horatio-mcallister.jpg (86.89 KiB) Viewed 7807 times
12000 Metro Kit
- rgorke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:37 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Drought Ravaged SoCal
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
I think that is the beauty of what Chapman describes. Just use what you know, major scale pattern and apply that to whatever mode you may want by shifting the starting point.
"If you make a mistake, do it twice and smile and let people think you meant it." Jan Van Halen.
- vanhalen5150
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:13 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Halifax, Canada
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
I get what he's pointing out there but your just using a small fraction of the entire mode. As you continue to move forward or back from that you will still be mapping out the entire mode shape I think.rgorke wrote:I think that is the beauty of what Chapman describes. Just use what you know, major scale pattern and apply that to whatever mode you may want by shifting the starting point.
I'm coming to the conclusion that there is not real "correct" way to look at this. There are some absolutes as far as the shapes go but your still improvising in and out of these modes and combining them at times.
Time for some clips!!
12000 Metro Kit
- rgorke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:37 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Drought Ravaged SoCal
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Yeah, he only does one octave. Just start, where you want to start, keeping the shape and scale and you stay in the mode. RIght?vanhalen5150 wrote:I get what he's pointing out there but your just using a small fraction of the entire mode. As you continue to move forward or back from that you will still be mapping out the entire mode shape I think.rgorke wrote:I think that is the beauty of what Chapman describes. Just use what you know, major scale pattern and apply that to whatever mode you may want by shifting the starting point.
I'm coming to the conclusion that there is not real "correct" way to look at this. There are some absolutes as far as the shapes go but your still improvising in and out of these modes and combining them at times.
Time for some clips!!
"If you make a mistake, do it twice and smile and let people think you meant it." Jan Van Halen.
- JimiJames
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Your head will be hurting more once you see how easy you are going to get this stuff down , in a mathematical fashion.
ALSO, Mark adds a simple two chord progression that offers depth to the mode being played/learned/studied.
Instead of playing against a so called "boring" drone note, he utilized the "diatonic chords" to play against.
In short, he just made one of the two chords "Home" for the progression.
For this (cheezy) example Pedal back & forth from the 2 and the 1
So, introducing to the listener what your 2 chord diatonic progression would be,
to lean heavily on the 2 chord (A minor/Dorian) and pedal off the 1 chord (G Major/Ionian) like this:
or pedal on the 3 chord but again, still leaning on the 2 chord.
NOW, Take a look at that 2nd mode. Just in that box alone, you can use the scale that derived from GMaj AND the familiar Pentatonic shape. (not to mention the arpeggios, but more on that later)
So now, I now can record and play back the progression to play over it. Getting a "feel" of how one mode (or this scale) sounds from the other six.
(Chromatic, Diminished, Augmented, Melodic & Harmonic minors, to come.... Oh yeah.... there's more ! )
TRY IT!
In Mark's examples, he uses a "drone note" to play against so that the ear familiarizes that mode's sound.NY Chief wrote:"...Ugh, this makes my head hurt..BUT I DO see some recognizable stuff in there! ...I first want to understand what I'm doing in the box pentatonic and it's extensions..."JimiJames wrote:
ALSO, Mark adds a simple two chord progression that offers depth to the mode being played/learned/studied.
Instead of playing against a so called "boring" drone note, he utilized the "diatonic chords" to play against.
In short, he just made one of the two chords "Home" for the progression.
For this (cheezy) example Pedal back & forth from the 2 and the 1
So, introducing to the listener what your 2 chord diatonic progression would be,
to lean heavily on the 2 chord (A minor/Dorian) and pedal off the 1 chord (G Major/Ionian) like this:
Code: Select all
I //// I //// I //// I //// I
________Amin_________I_GMaj_I
Code: Select all
I //// I //// I //// I //// I
________Amin_________I_Bmin_I
So now, I now can record and play back the progression to play over it. Getting a "feel" of how one mode (or this scale) sounds from the other six.
(Chromatic, Diminished, Augmented, Melodic & Harmonic minors, to come.... Oh yeah.... there's more ! )
TRY IT!
- vanhalen5150
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:13 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Halifax, Canada
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Here is a pretty good image of a 24 fret neck if anyone needs to put out some questions or ideas.
- Attachments
-
- 24 board.jpg (72.73 KiB) Viewed 7759 times
12000 Metro Kit
- rgorke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:37 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Drought Ravaged SoCal
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Those neck graphs are very helpful...
So, if you have a backing track that is C minor...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWPgY_8O9ck" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (the video part of this says G major but it is C)
Since C minor is the relative minor of Eb, does that mean I can play Eb major over this? Or Eb lydian and/or mixolydian?
Sounds like it works but ?????
So, if you have a backing track that is C minor...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWPgY_8O9ck" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (the video part of this says G major but it is C)
Since C minor is the relative minor of Eb, does that mean I can play Eb major over this? Or Eb lydian and/or mixolydian?
Sounds like it works but ?????
"If you make a mistake, do it twice and smile and let people think you meant it." Jan Van Halen.
- mightymike
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3757
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:53 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Contact:
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Here's a working class way to skin this cat. The 5 major scale positions. Memorizing these 5 really helped me learn how to solo in any key. Learn the 5, and slide it, go diagonal from one to another, jump positions and know every note on the entire neck in any key instantly. The higlighted note is the root, but you can go from the 2 to 2 , or 4 to the 4.. Whatever mode you want, and it's really just that simple. Most learned the 1st posistion as a beginner so you're 20% there already.
http://www.discoverguitaronline.com/diagrams/1.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.discoverguitaronline.com/diagrams/1.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Attachments
-
- rps20131116_192003.jpg (76.45 KiB) Viewed 7728 times
-
- 1.png
- (59.96 KiB) Downloaded 655 times
- JimiJames
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Great post there, man ! *high-five* on the numbers !
That diagram should help guitar players see how their fretboard all fits together; as well as separated.
Any tips or tricks ?
That diagram should help guitar players see how their fretboard all fits together; as well as separated.
Any tips or tricks ?
vanhalen5150 wrote:"...fraction of the entire mode. As you continue to move forward or back from that you will still be mapping out the entire mode shape I think.
I'm coming to the conclusion that there is not real "correct" way to look at this. There are some absolutes as far as the shapes go but your still improvising in and out of these modes and combining them at times.
- JimiJames
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
haha ! aye man??? Take a look back at that custom Pentatonic diagram I previously posted.NY Chief wrote:"..BUT I DO see some recognizable stuff in there!.../... I first want to understand what I'm doing in the box pentatonic and it's extensions..."
Now check out mightymike's Ex. 2,3&5 ! Whatcha' see there, palaroo ?
(It's almost there in Ex.1. Although a minor, the difference would be that it is a minor7th b5)
That should make it easier to play with a little more expression, eh ? Getcha ta' be a virtuoso just yet !
That should be good for a couple a cold ones for mightymike there, no? what ?
- JimiJames
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 6:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re:Community input
Where should this Topic best reside on the forum ?
Should it be made a sticky?
Should it get relocated to Off Topic or Guitars ?
Whatever fair/best for our community.
Personally I like it here away from amp related.
Should it be made a sticky?
Should it get relocated to Off Topic or Guitars ?
Whatever fair/best for our community.
Personally I like it here away from amp related.
- rgorke
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:37 am
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Drought Ravaged SoCal
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
There was a thread a while back that has a lot of theory as it relates to EVH. There are great nuggets in there but also has a lot of IMHO, nonsense.
So, here is the thread if you want to read the whole thing:
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=41322" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So, here is the thread if you want to read the whole thing:
http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=41322" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
mr.twistyneck wrote:efraser68 wrote:Hey Twisty, great explanations and I think there are couple of things might need correcting (I too am not a music teacher).mr.twistyneck wrote:He uses the pentatonic box in ways most don't - partly due to how he was musically taught at a young age and IMHO his somewhat unorthodox pick grip.
<full disclosure: I am not a music teacher. If I make some mistakes here, you've been warned>
He likes the Mixolydian mode and the Dorian mode. Mixolydian is just a Major scale with a dominant 7 - so the hop from the 7th note to the octave above the root is a whole step rather than a half. Why? it may be that his ear likes it - but it's also easy to play - start anywhere on the Low E and play the 1st, 3rd and 5th frets, then do the same on the A string and D string. bam, there's ya Mixylidden. "Same-ness" is key here - the more patterns that walk the same way across all strings (end of Jump Solo, the beginning of Ice Cream Man solo, et al) the more he was apt to use them.
If you know the major scale, by moving it up and down the neck you can be in a different mode.
So if you play a G major scale over an A blues progression, you're going to be in A Dorian. look at the 2nd barrage of pulloffs in the beginning sequence of Eruption - see how those fit neatly over a major scale? that's a G major scale, but he's playing it over the implied A chord - ergo, Dorian. hat's Mixolydian, because you've got the Flatted G of the E scale.
I'll double check later this week when I have time. Modes are fun - there are basically seven patterns on guitar, and if you happen to like one pattern over the rest, just familiarize yourself with the pattern, then shift it depending on what feel you want to use.
So if you're vamping on a D9 chord, play an A-major scale.
if you're vamping on an A chord, play a G major scale
stuff like that. it's the same as how you take the pentatonic box that everybody plays at the 12 fret (minor pentatonic) and shift it down 4 frets and bang, you're playing country (major pentatonic).
- The part about doing 1st, 3rd, and 5th fret on low E, A, and D strings being Mixolydian might be true, but depends on the context of the chord it's being played over, yes? But as a "shape" it does have a flattened or dominant 7
"Similarly, if you play an E major scale over an A chord, that's Mixolydian, because you've got the Flatted G of the E scale.
"
- I believe playing a D maj scale over an A chord is Mixolydian:
A maj chord: A, C#, E, G# (i, iii, v, vii)
D maj scale: D, E, F#, G , A, B, C# (G here is the dom 7 of the A maj)
But and A maj scale over an E chord should be Mixolydian as well, maybe that's what you meant?
But someone may have to check my work too
efraser68 wrote:I know this really isn't relevant to the OP, and I'm guessing Ed didn't construct his solos thinking in the context of modes. But the only way I've been able to understand modes is that are not different scales, just the major scale played on top of a chord that is diatonic to that major scale. For example, I wouldn't consider "B Phrygian" to be it's own scale or shape...but just a G maj scale over a B chord. You can start from the B if you like, but it's still a G maj scale.
And it's easier to see when you spell out the notes:
G maj (Ionian): G, A, B, C, D, E, F#
A (Dorian): A, B, C, D, E, F#, G
B (Phrygian): B, C, D, E, F#, G, A
C (Lydian): C, D, E, F#, G, A, B
D (Mixolydian): D, E, F#, G, A, B, C
E (Aeolian): E, F#, G, A, B, C, D
F# (Locrian): F#, G, A, B, C, D, E
"If you make a mistake, do it twice and smile and let people think you meant it." Jan Van Halen.
- NY Chief
- Wiki Editor
- Posts: 6589
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:02 pm
- Location: SoCal
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Coolio!! Been out on my bike for a few good days of R&R. Now back TO R&R!!!mightymike wrote:Here's a working class way to skin this cat. The 5 major scale positions. Memorizing these 5 really helped me learn how to solo in any key. Learn the 5, and slide it, go diagonal from one to another, jump positions and know every note on the entire neck in any key instantly. The higlighted note is the root, but you can go from the 2 to 2 , or 4 to the 4.. Whatever mode you want, and it's really just that simple. Most learned the 1st posistion as a beginner so you're 20% there already.
http://www.discoverguitaronline.com/diagrams/1.png" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Great post mv, that's the one I've been looking for.
And thanks for flaggin' the post, JJ!
NY Chief 5-0, transplanted in SoCal
"Book 'em, Dan-o!"
"Book 'em, Dan-o!"
- vanhalen5150
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:13 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Halifax, Canada
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
Im missing somthing on those major box's. What do the numbers represent?
12000 Metro Kit
- mightymike
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3757
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 8:53 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Contact:
Re: Guitar: Theoretically Speaking
R is the root note and 1st note of the scale. In this example G. Like the song Do Ray me...