100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

New here? Need help? Don't know where to post? Post here.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:27 pm

Greetings everyone.

I am getting ready to pull the trigger on another amp build. I built a 67 plexi running 6550s last year as my first build. I ran into some problems, but eventually figured them out.....and yes,,,,,she screams!

For my next project, I am going to try something a little different. I like the tone of the 1986 marshall bass amp favored by D. Allman; however, I need more headroom so I would like to build it as a 100 watt. The overdrive from the 1986 model seems so much thicker and "softer" than the 100 watt. From what I know, the preamp is the same as a marshall super bass 100watt, but there are some changes in the power section such as filtering.

Does anyone have any ideas on how to convert the 1986 to a 100 watt? I WILL be ordering a ceriatone kit if that helps out.

All the best,
Brandon

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by neikeel » Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:06 am

Build a Model 1992 Superbass but go with 100uF mains filtering (i.e. use x2 100+100 cans for mains)
Neil

bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Tue Apr 07, 2015 7:54 am

Thanks. So, thats it? Change mains to 100uf cans?

bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:56 am

I thought that going to higher filtering the amp would be more stiffer?

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by neikeel » Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:56 pm

bmcash wrote:I thought that going to higher filtering the amp would be more stiffer?
That is the only difference between 1992 and 1987 (apart from 2 vs 4 tubes) and you asked about different filtering.
Neil

bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:23 pm

Sorry, but I still dont understand. If I look at the layout of a 50 watt I see 50 uf cans. Am I missing some type of series vs parallel?

bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:25 pm

Sorry, but I still dont understand. If I look at the layout of a 50 watt I see 50 uf cans. Am I missing some type of series vs parallel?

bmcash
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:56 pm
Just the numbers in order: 13492

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by bmcash » Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:42 pm

Aaahhhhhh...i see the light now. corrr t if I am wrong. 50 +50 in parallel is 100uf total for the 50 watt. To match that, i will need two 100/100 uf can...in parallel and series.

User avatar
neikeel
Senior Member
Posts: 7231
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
Location: Suffolk, England

Re: 100 watt 1986 marshall bass head

Post by neikeel » Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:46 am

bmcash wrote:Aaahhhhhh...i see the light now. corrr t if I am wrong. 50 +50 in parallel is 100uf total for the 50 watt. To match that, i will need two 100/100 uf can...in parallel and series.
:thumbsup:
Neil

Post Reply