jof006 wrote:So does anyone build such a beast with all that contained in one head cabinet? (how about it George?)
That would be superb.
The problem with this as anyone who has ever tried it (like me) will tell you is that you just can't stop experimenting and finding a one size fits all solution to everything never happens. I did this exact thing, I have an amp with a variac built in (1 cm inch from the OT with zero buzz btw) with an attenuator built in, with every VH mod I could think of and throwing out everything that I didn't think mattered like 4 hole input and actual knobs for the treble middle bass. I just hard wired to '10' did everything else PTP off the sockets, mounted the whole thing in a small non back breaking ergonomic enclosure, saved a ton of space and wire mess and ended up making the whole thing really quiet portable tone-monster amp.
The problem then is, as soon as it's done I thought up 10 new things I wanted to try and some experiments with parts I never put in because I thought they were not important (like the routing possibilities you can do with 4 holes of input). (Hidden Tone secret for those paying attention: 2 64ks in parallel sound way more interesting than just hard wiring in one 32k). And by redesigning the whole thing I threw out what I thought was Marshall's outdated poor (or just cheap) legacy grounding arrangements issues which it turns out might be critical to the EVH sound. (EVH did complain about his Marshall's hiss) So in the end, this amp is great but it's not the end all be all greatest tone machine I could ever think of because it's limited by my re-design.
My conclusion from that experiment was: There are factors that might not be known now, or ever in the future completely understood, and to go too far off the path is potentially and most likely limiting yourself in some unknown way on this particular tone quest. Factors like, does rust on the laminations help the tone? How did Dagnal change the iron composition from 67 to 69 and what did that do to the sound? Does rotation and placement of the OT matter? Does the treatment of the chassis (zinc bath or whatever) affect anything especially since such heavy currents are flowing through parts of it? Why do old Marshalls that have blown up at some point (and fixed) seem to sound better than ones that haven't? (just my opinion) Really difficult to quanitfy and answer stuff. Scientifically, for now, the best thing to do trying to reverse engineer the 'mojo' is to replicate it as exactly as possible with the right parts, experiment, and see what factors affect each other. Stuff that seems unimportant might turn out to be everything.
I still plan to, when I 'figure it all out' go back and update that amp to make it perfect but in reality I don't think will ever happen as there's always something else to tweek, think about, play with, experiment and try and there's no way to plan ahead or engineer for that. Anyway, went on way too long, Sorry to rant.