
I agree, we know enough now to begin the testing phase.
We need our own raw clips of clones/reconed/original d120's and greenies mixed and effects added post to draw some conclusions.
Moderators: VelvetGeorge, RACKSYSTEMS
spaceace76 wrote:not that I know of. actually, when i first read that Ed was using them I thought it was a lie, since there's such an emphasis on his use of greenbacks. but it explains a hell of a lot about his tone.bortz wrote:Any other recording artists using Marshall with JBL's?
the implication is that the celestions cover the lows, and the jbl's handle the highs. it's also been suggested that EQ is added in post production that boosts the 8k and 10k frequencies. listen to the raw tracks again. this is all substantiated by comparing the raw (that's with no post and no reverb) to the recording. The celestions sound almost muffled, and the jbl's are fairly bright. add the verb and EQ in post and you've got THE tone. no secret/magic boxes, no insane marshall mods, just Ed and the gear we've already had proof he used. the result is that wide bandwidth, huge sound that everyone loves. studio tricks are the key to the tone. if I had the cash i'd be investing in trying different JBL clones, and some extra mics.bortz wrote:Allegedly, the Allman brothers tone comes from the LP/Marshall/JBL chain, and since that's obviously not early Ed tone, maybe it is Ed's specific amp combined with the JBL/Celestion combo cab, plus the recording and mastering work, with the emphasis being the Ed amp/jbl combo.
there's supposedly a picture of this big resistor, but i've never seen it. anyone have that shot?vanhalen5150 wrote:Everyone really went off on that big resistor sticking out of Ed's amp early on.
The thing is the output transformer is quite capable of putting out way beyond 8 khz...So when you hook up your speaker cab you have now rolled off everything like a low pass filter above 5khz...This doesn't sound like Eddies tone. I say he uses the resistor and soaks the power for furthur processing ie "the univox and eq" to produce a nice bright true echo tone that has been boosted in the 8khz range. Then off to the power amps it goes but this time it goes to the celestan 5khz cutoff and the jbl 8khz high freq speaker.leadguy wrote:Well, slaving just results in a combo sound of the 2 amps and so does daisy chaining 2 different amps together and miking them.
No magic frequencies from either setup.
There is no evidence that Ed slaved and had the echoplex after the first amp in the pre H&H days.
Just remove the Macs hard disk and put it in another computer for the photo.
RACKSYSTEMS
Well here is what i was told by Rudy Leiren his long time tech. This was just last week. His setup was flanger phaser echoplex amp. His main 100 watt was used on everything. The bias was turned all the way up and the variac was set to 91v. into only 1 cab. There is a pic of the early days with a 50 watt and a vox. He told me the 50 was a back up to the 100 and the vox was a last ditch back up. He often borrowed amps for his back ups. In fact he told me a story that at a party they were playing ed blew a fuse in his main amp and did not have a backup and had to rum home to get a fuse while the band was playing. After this he always made sure he had a backup. Now Rudy said the eq pedal was used only for certain guitars or sometimes when he used rental gear that sounded bad. Also the univox echo was patched in by hand for eruption only and then was taken out of the chain after. Later there was another cab on Mike side that was driven from another amp they used a splitter to do this. As time went on more cabs where used and so where more amps. The amps would only drive on cab though. Now he did say ed was always trying shit but would always come back to this set up. This info follows everything ed has ever said to me personally. Also when 84 hit he changed his set up to H&H power amps and some different effects etc. He still used a cab off the head though no load resister. The Load resister came for the 5150 tour.