biasing method
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:24 pm
biasing method
this 1 ohm resistor biasing method? 1 ohm between pin 8 and ground. what voltage drop are you supposed to be measuring? i just used the reading on the plates multiplied by the reading on pin 5 to get static dissipation...what am i doing wrong?
mike
mike
- Flames1950
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9294
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Waukee, Iowa
When using the one ohm resistor method you just measure across the resistor (one probe on one side, one on the other) with your meter set to the lowest DC range you've got. You should get a reading in millivolts.
The whole thing works by Ohm's Law, where your [bias current = (voltage across the one ohm resistor) divided by (the resistance of the resistor)] and since the resistance is one, you effectively get that your [bias current = your voltage drop across the resistor.]
The whole thing works by Ohm's Law, where your [bias current = (voltage across the one ohm resistor) divided by (the resistance of the resistor)] and since the resistance is one, you effectively get that your [bias current = your voltage drop across the resistor.]

- martin g
- Senior Member
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 am
- Location: Poland
- Contact:
- Flames1950
- Senior Member
- Posts: 9294
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:04 am
- Location: Waukee, Iowa
- martin g
- Senior Member
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 am
- Location: Poland
- Contact:
- Dax-The-Ax
- Senior Member
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:41 am
- Location: Tucson
- 5150loveeddie
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Montreal, Quebec CANADA
can someone explain the other method (more dangerous but more precise...) I remember Jon talking about it, something with power trannie and something else?????????????
Last edited by 5150loveeddie on Mon Mar 14, 2005 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Glutathione increase specialist
http://www.max.com/science/448523/full/ ... lutathione" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.max.com/science/448523/full/ ... lutathione" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Country Boy Shane
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 11:37 pm
- Location: Troy, MI
- Contact:
- 5150loveeddie
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 8:52 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Montreal, Quebec CANADA
Hey Shane everytime I see your picture I get that funny feeling you had garlic for lunch 

Glutathione increase specialist
http://www.max.com/science/448523/full/ ... lutathione" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.max.com/science/448523/full/ ... lutathione" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Gtr_tech
- Senior Member
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:47 pm
The method you speak of involves shunting half the OT primary with an ammeter, or a multimeter set up to read *current* (very important). Not recommended for Marshalls or other english amps (low dcR primary, won't give an accurate reading) but fine for Fenders and the like. One lead goes to the center tap of the OT, the other goes to the plate of the output tube (or pair) you're measuring. Plate (+screen) current reads directly on meter. 4 tube amps (parellel pairs) will read current for BOTH parellel tubes, so remember to figure half the reading to get one tube's idle current.
Don't try this unless you're ABSOLUTELY sure you understand what you're doing.
Use a good quality (Fluke, Beckman, etc) meter. Cheap meters are notorious for bogus I readings, not to mention they probably aren't intended to be used with 400v+, even though the scale may go that high.
Remember that when the meter's set up for reading current, there is a very low resistance from one lead to the other (for I sensing) and if you have one lead connected with the chassis off stby, there will be HV on the other probe. Connect leads (preferrably minigrabbers), then hit the stby sw, read, back on stby. DON'T touch the chassis at anytime when handling a connected lead, even on stby (caps can still have a charge, depends on location of stby sw in circuit). HV through your heart can kill it dead.....really dead. Ampeg's and their sky high plate supply still give me the willies.
I still remember the first (and last) time I got jolted with HV. Back in my high school days I was messing with my Traynor 1-12 el84 combo after replacing filter caps, and found the HV winding by mistake. It took me exactly 3 cycles of AC to figure out what happened. Made a believer out of me. Better safe than dead.......
Don't try this unless you're ABSOLUTELY sure you understand what you're doing.
Use a good quality (Fluke, Beckman, etc) meter. Cheap meters are notorious for bogus I readings, not to mention they probably aren't intended to be used with 400v+, even though the scale may go that high.
Remember that when the meter's set up for reading current, there is a very low resistance from one lead to the other (for I sensing) and if you have one lead connected with the chassis off stby, there will be HV on the other probe. Connect leads (preferrably minigrabbers), then hit the stby sw, read, back on stby. DON'T touch the chassis at anytime when handling a connected lead, even on stby (caps can still have a charge, depends on location of stby sw in circuit). HV through your heart can kill it dead.....really dead. Ampeg's and their sky high plate supply still give me the willies.
I still remember the first (and last) time I got jolted with HV. Back in my high school days I was messing with my Traynor 1-12 el84 combo after replacing filter caps, and found the HV winding by mistake. It took me exactly 3 cycles of AC to figure out what happened. Made a believer out of me. Better safe than dead.......
- Country Boy Shane
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 11:37 pm
- Location: Troy, MI
- Contact:
I have been using the shunt method for a while but now I am concerned.Gtr_tech wrote:The method you speak of involves shunting half the OT primary with an ammeter, or a multimeter set up to read *current* (very important). Not recommended for Marshalls or other english amps (low dcR primary, won't give an accurate reading) but fine for Fenders and the like. One lead goes to the center tap of the OT, the other goes to the plate of the output tube (or pair) you're measuring. Plate (+screen) current reads directly on meter. 4 tube amps (parellel pairs) will read current for BOTH parellel tubes, so remember to figure half the reading to get one tube's idle current.
Don't try this unless you're ABSOLUTELY sure you understand what you're doing.
Use a good quality (Fluke, Beckman, etc) meter. Cheap meters are notorious for bogus I readings, not to mention they probably aren't intended to be used with 400v+, even though the scale may go that high.
Remember that when the meter's set up for reading current, there is a very low resistance from one lead to the other (for I sensing) and if you have one lead connected with the chassis off stby, there will be HV on the other probe. Connect leads (preferrably minigrabbers), then hit the stby sw, read, back on stby. DON'T touch the chassis at anytime when handling a connected lead, even on stby (caps can still have a charge, depends on location of stby sw in circuit). HV through your heart can kill it dead.....really dead. Ampeg's and their sky high plate supply still give me the willies.
I still remember the first (and last) time I got jolted with HV. Back in my high school days I was messing with my Traynor 1-12 el84 combo after replacing filter caps, and found the HV winding by mistake. It took me exactly 3 cycles of AC to figure out what happened. Made a believer out of me. Better safe than dead.......
How inaccurate would my readings be? ( I did not know about the low dcR on the primary) I ordered some 1 ohm resistors from George yesterday since I figured after reading Gtr_tech's post and what Lord Valve says about the shunt method on Marshalls ( the same thing) maybe I shouldn't use it. I just want the most accurate method possible ( whatever that may be for Marshalls).
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Virginia