
If you get the chance try taking the bright cap out of the unit completely and you might be pleasantly suprised. And trust me you still will have all the treble you need
Moderators: VelvetGeorge, BUG
i already posted this clip page 3 , 9th post of this thread ages ago ..... well i wouldn't say it's my favorite too lol , to precise things further i think we could call this the best , final , absolute perfect , spot on woodstock tone regardless of the feel of the guitarist itself ( who apart from beeing a bit on the poser side , plays very very well ) .... it's simply IT ..no debate possible about that .... period ....i think we'll agree on this one xplorerXplorer wrote:thanks tone slinger. well, you didn't hear me because i totaly suck compared to such playing. if i post something, it certainly won't be to say : i'm the best ; ) but maybe to show some little simple things. but i can hear the music, even if i can't play at this level. fights are boring, and i'd really prefer everyone to show how to do this or that for cool things, and share awsome guitar stuffs . Let's all be some guitar gods ; )![]()
![]()
this one is among my favourites ( althought, a bit too fast )
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOTrjKbCkFM[/youtube]
Brandon wrote:Pic of the guts of my new Woodstock Replica Amp by George:
I haven't gotten a chance to crank it yet, but with the MV, standing in certain position in front of the amp, it definetly has that woodstock tone.
Although the MV is a bit funny... It seems to create a lot of dissonance in the tone, almost like when turning the output up too high beyond the inputs threshold, like in recording, and it causes that staticy sound when the volume peaks.
The MV also seems to do funny things with the mids and highs. With regular low capacitance cables, it sounds pretty unbearable, but with a good 60 feet+ of coily cord, it sounds pretty bitchin.
I guess I'm going to have to save up for an aracom attenuator.
heatpad wrote:Will do