Standard Liability clause. They do not want to accept liability for damaged cause by a product that isn't theirs. Since use of a power attenuator has been know to put higher stress on an amplifier, and Marshall sometimes have enough problems on their own with out use of one (for a number of reasons) It would make perfect sense to not accept liability for this, and can be part of the misuse clause.bobtec wrote:IN The History of Marshall by Mike Doyle on page 196, Curcuit Diagrams it said "Caution due to unique output curcuit used on Marshall amps,the use of ANY "Power Attenuator" could cause Severe damage to output stage,therefor voiding the units warranty" Then they show on p. 72 the SE100 and the Power Brake PB100 and how great both are...Maybe some of you guys in the UK know...Why would they sell you some thing that blows up you amp
Now if it's their own product that caused damage to their own amps, things change drastically