Layout Question: 2K2 Screen Grid Resistors / 0.22uF PT caps

Get support and show off your MetroAmp 50 Watt kit builds.

Moderator: VelvetGeorge

Post Reply
TheRedDevil
Senior Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:18 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Layout Question: 2K2 Screen Grid Resistors / 0.22uF PT caps

Post by TheRedDevil » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:16 pm

Hello guys.

After upgrade of my JTM45 reissue (http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php ... highlight=) I just want to do the same with my '92 1987x reissue amp.

I looked on VelvetGeorge's amp layout and also on Ceriatone layout

http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?t=14850

http://www.ceriatone.com/images/layoutP ... iatone.jpg

I found two differences:

a) In the Ceriatone layout I found two 0.22uF caps on boared connected to 325V connectors of PT. I can't find them on VelvetGeorge's layout. Do you know why?

b) I have 2K2 5W screen grid resistors in my '92 1987x reissue amp. In VelvetGeorge's amp layout and also on Ceriatone layout they use 1K 5W screen grid resistors. Do I really have to change them to 1K 5W, if I want a maximum of security for life of my OT?

Hope you can help me.

Regards,
TheRedDevil
AC/DC Angus Young sound fanatic, owner of '69 Gibson SG, Angus Signature SG, '91 Gibson SG Standard, Epiphone G-400 with '57 Classic, '89 Marshall JTM45, '92 Marshall 1987x, Marshall 1960AV Vintage 30 4x12", 16 ohms THD HotPlate

User avatar
toner
Senior Member
Posts: 2582
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Iowa

Re: Layout Question: 2K2 Screen Grid Resistors / 0.22uF PT c

Post by toner » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:12 pm

TheRedDevil wrote:In the Ceriatone layout I found two 0.22uF caps on boared connected to 325V connectors of PT. I can't find them on VelvetGeorge's layout. Do you know why?
Those are "snubber caps". They reduce rectifier diode switching noise. Modern diodes don't really need these caps. Search for "snubber" for more info.

I'm not sure about the screen grid resistors. 2k2 is probably overkill but I'm not sure how they would affect tone. I think they may roll off a little treble, compared to 1k resistors. ?

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:22 pm

According to Larry you have to raise those grid resistors to over 20k before you can notice any treble roll off. I put 10k on and I really didnt notice anything. It may be that its inaudible or so small that the time to change was too long to keep a perfect comparison for the change.

George uses those snubbers on the stock 100W 69 amp. Was it even on original 50W boards around 69 and later? I dont know to be honest but Nik at Ceria doesnt exactly go all out for authenticity with things like this.
Last edited by Billy Batz on Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SDM
Senior Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:24 am
Just the numbers in order: 13492
Location: MI

Post by SDM » Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:16 pm

Billy Batz wrote:According to Larry you have to raise those grid resistors to over 20k before you can notice any treble roll off.......
Good stuff there but that's for grid resistors, think he's asking about the screen resistors here. 2.2K (2K2) 5watt resistors actually afford more protection for the tubes and likely the only reason why Marshall used them for a while. 1K's are the typical/standard Marshall value and help keep the amp sounding like it was meant to. With decent tubes these days and typical 1987 voltages I wouldn't worry about going with the traditional 1K 5watters on the screens.

Billy Batz
Senior Member
Posts: 8566
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:49 pm

Post by Billy Batz » Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:43 pm

Jeezus Im staying out of the 50W page. :roll: Toner will know what I mean. I seem to be disleczik in here.

User avatar
novosibir
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
Just the numbers in order: 7
Location: Nuernberg, Germany
Contact:

Post by novosibir » Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:47 pm

SDM wrote:
Billy Batz wrote:... think he's asking about the screen resistors here. 2.2K (2K2) 5watt resistors actually afford more protection for the tubes and likely the only reason why Marshall used them for a while.
... and make the power stage's sound a bit lifeless, when used with EL34's.

And yes, like Steve already said - Marshall has used this value in the early 90', as power tube quality was terribly bad, so that the amps at least survived the 6 months warranty at that time :lol:

At that time, the Russian 5881 was the only reliable power tube available, so some time later in the early 90' they switched to this tube.

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp :wink:

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

Post Reply