1986 & 1987 JMP 50 Watt Head with EL34
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
- Freebird
- Senior Member
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
1986 & 1987 JMP 50 Watt Head with EL34
Soon I'd like to build one Marshall 50 watt head. So far I'm not sure which one I will go for. I prefer old blues rock style as Allman Bros, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Rory Gallagher etc. It could be an assortment from both side of 1986/1987.
There are many different buildings even for 1986 and also for 1987. Probably Marshall assembled what they just had, later some were tweaked and some were repaired and had their specific parts. Some very informative websites together with this forum I found here:
- http://www.drtube.com/marshall.htm#JMP
- http://www.marstran.com/
- http://marshall.redpt.com/clay/marshall ... s_101.html
To start from scratch the key data are according to schematic diagram from G+W Unicord Incorporated as follows:
<b>1986 JMP Bass</b> (scheme: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/1986u.gif)
Basically 1986 Bass amp has similarities to JTM45!
- shared cathode circuit in 1st stage: 820R/320uF
- 1st to 2nd stage coupling cap on bright channel: 0.022uF
- mixer resistors: 470k
- mixer bypass cap: 500pF (common in reality: 560pF)
- bright cap on bright volume: no
- 2nd stage V2A cathode circuit: 820R
- tone stack, slope resistor/tone cap: 56k/250pF
- PI output coupling caps: 0.1uF
- negative feedback resistor: 47k at 8ohm-tap of output tranny (common in reality: 27k)
- presence control: 5k pot/0.1uF
- screen grid resistors: no
- control grid resistors: no
- power transformer: 1202-118 (common in reality from 1969: 1202-164)
- output transformer: 784-139 (common in reality in 1967: 784-128)
<b>1987 JMP Lead</b> (scheme: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/1987u.gif)
- <b>split</b> cathode circuit in 1st stage: V1A=820R/320uF, <b>V1B=2.7k/0.68uF</b>
- 1st to 2nd stage coupling cap on bright channel: <b>0.0022uF</b>
- mixer resistors: 470k
- mixer bypass cap: 500pF (common in reality: 560pF)
- bright cap on bright volume: <b>0.005uF</b> (common in reality: no cap)
- 2nd stage V2A cathode circuit: 820R/<b>0.68uF</b>
- tone stack, slope resistor/tone cap: <b>33k/500pF</b>
- PI output coupling caps: <b>0.022uF</b>
- negative feedback resistor: 47k at 8ohm-tap of output tranny (common in reality: 100k at 4 or 8ohm-tap)
- presence control: 5k pot/0.1uF (common in reality: 25k pot with 4.7k/0.68uf)
- screen grid resistors: no
- control grid resistors: no
- power transformer: 1202-118 (common in reality from 1969: 1202-164)
- output transformer: 784-139 (common in reality in 1967: 784-128)
<b>My questions or what do you recommend for?</b>
- rectifier diodes: 2 or 4, 1N4007 or FRED?
- choke: Is it 3H?
- main filtering: dual 32uF, 40uF or 50uF?
- screen filtering: single/dual 32uF, 40uF or 50 uF?
- preamp filtering: single/dual 32uF, 40uF or 50 uF?
I know above mentioned information can vary from amp to amp of different years and so. In reality the amps have other parts and components in use as shown in standard schematic diagrams. That makes building a 50 watter unclear and could becom a long story to nail it. I'd like to take the bull by the horn and hopefully find the path to the right direction.
Thanks in advance for any advice, recommendation or straight tip.
Daniel
There are many different buildings even for 1986 and also for 1987. Probably Marshall assembled what they just had, later some were tweaked and some were repaired and had their specific parts. Some very informative websites together with this forum I found here:
- http://www.drtube.com/marshall.htm#JMP
- http://www.marstran.com/
- http://marshall.redpt.com/clay/marshall ... s_101.html
To start from scratch the key data are according to schematic diagram from G+W Unicord Incorporated as follows:
<b>1986 JMP Bass</b> (scheme: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/1986u.gif)
Basically 1986 Bass amp has similarities to JTM45!
- shared cathode circuit in 1st stage: 820R/320uF
- 1st to 2nd stage coupling cap on bright channel: 0.022uF
- mixer resistors: 470k
- mixer bypass cap: 500pF (common in reality: 560pF)
- bright cap on bright volume: no
- 2nd stage V2A cathode circuit: 820R
- tone stack, slope resistor/tone cap: 56k/250pF
- PI output coupling caps: 0.1uF
- negative feedback resistor: 47k at 8ohm-tap of output tranny (common in reality: 27k)
- presence control: 5k pot/0.1uF
- screen grid resistors: no
- control grid resistors: no
- power transformer: 1202-118 (common in reality from 1969: 1202-164)
- output transformer: 784-139 (common in reality in 1967: 784-128)
<b>1987 JMP Lead</b> (scheme: http://www.drtube.com/schematics/marshall/1987u.gif)
- <b>split</b> cathode circuit in 1st stage: V1A=820R/320uF, <b>V1B=2.7k/0.68uF</b>
- 1st to 2nd stage coupling cap on bright channel: <b>0.0022uF</b>
- mixer resistors: 470k
- mixer bypass cap: 500pF (common in reality: 560pF)
- bright cap on bright volume: <b>0.005uF</b> (common in reality: no cap)
- 2nd stage V2A cathode circuit: 820R/<b>0.68uF</b>
- tone stack, slope resistor/tone cap: <b>33k/500pF</b>
- PI output coupling caps: <b>0.022uF</b>
- negative feedback resistor: 47k at 8ohm-tap of output tranny (common in reality: 100k at 4 or 8ohm-tap)
- presence control: 5k pot/0.1uF (common in reality: 25k pot with 4.7k/0.68uf)
- screen grid resistors: no
- control grid resistors: no
- power transformer: 1202-118 (common in reality from 1969: 1202-164)
- output transformer: 784-139 (common in reality in 1967: 784-128)
<b>My questions or what do you recommend for?</b>
- rectifier diodes: 2 or 4, 1N4007 or FRED?
- choke: Is it 3H?
- main filtering: dual 32uF, 40uF or 50uF?
- screen filtering: single/dual 32uF, 40uF or 50 uF?
- preamp filtering: single/dual 32uF, 40uF or 50 uF?
I know above mentioned information can vary from amp to amp of different years and so. In reality the amps have other parts and components in use as shown in standard schematic diagrams. That makes building a 50 watter unclear and could becom a long story to nail it. I'd like to take the bull by the horn and hopefully find the path to the right direction.
Thanks in advance for any advice, recommendation or straight tip.
Daniel
- neikeel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7231
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:31 am
- Location: Suffolk, England
From the top:
I would either use the metal case diodes x4 or the 1N5408 (1kv 3A) diodes x4 to be sure-to be sure.
Std 7H choke (352-114).
Dual 32uF in preamp, 32uF PI, 32uF screens and dual 32uF in power supply (ie x3 32uF caps) 2 on top one horizontal inside.
I like split cathode and a small bright cap, you might prefer shared cathode without one. Not sure there is much difference between 56k/250pF and 33k/500pF tone stack (see calculator).
I prefer 0.022/0.033/0.047uF in the PI rather than 0.1
I remain unconvinced by 0.0022coupler and may switch to 0.018 soon
I prefer 47k NFB onto the speaker jack (ie usually 16ohm).
I used Marstran 139 OT and Metro PT
I would strongly urge you to use 1k grid protectors with new output valves.
What do the rest of you think?
I would either use the metal case diodes x4 or the 1N5408 (1kv 3A) diodes x4 to be sure-to be sure.
Std 7H choke (352-114).
Dual 32uF in preamp, 32uF PI, 32uF screens and dual 32uF in power supply (ie x3 32uF caps) 2 on top one horizontal inside.
I like split cathode and a small bright cap, you might prefer shared cathode without one. Not sure there is much difference between 56k/250pF and 33k/500pF tone stack (see calculator).
I prefer 0.022/0.033/0.047uF in the PI rather than 0.1
I remain unconvinced by 0.0022coupler and may switch to 0.018 soon
I prefer 47k NFB onto the speaker jack (ie usually 16ohm).
I used Marstran 139 OT and Metro PT
I would strongly urge you to use 1k grid protectors with new output valves.
What do the rest of you think?
Neil
- Freebird
- Senior Member
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Thanks neikeel for your responses!
In theorie it seems not to be a big difference, but soundwise?

Metal case diodes? for good looking or sweeter tone? Why not FRED's?neikeel wrote:From the top:
I would either use the metal case diodes x4 or the 1N5408 (1kv 3A) diodes x4 to be sure-to be sure.
7H I guess is maximumneikeel wrote: Std 7H choke (352-114).
Do you mean 2 dual on top and one single inside on the PTP or dual inside chassis wall?neikeel wrote: Dual 32uF in preamp, 32uF PI, 32uF screens and dual 32uF in power supply (ie x3 32uF caps) 2 on top one horizontal inside.
cut-off-frequenzy: 56k/250p=11368Hz, 33k/500pf=9645Hzneikeel wrote: I like split cathode and a small bright cap, you might prefer shared cathode without one. Not sure there is much difference between 56k/250pF and 33k/500pF tone stack (see calculator).
In theorie it seems not to be a big difference, but soundwise?
Lots to experiment withneikeel wrote: I prefer 0.022/0.033/0.047uF in the PI rather than 0.1
I remain unconvinced by 0.0022coupler and may switch to 0.018 soon
I prefer 47k NFB onto the speaker jack (ie usually 16ohm).

What's the different between Marstran 139 OT and Metroamp 139 OT?neikeel wrote: I used Marstran 139 OT and Metro PT
Yes for sure, that's for protection of the output tranny.neikeel wrote: I would strongly urge you to use 1k grid protectors with new output valves.
- Gunner
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:39 am
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Sweden, Värmdö
- Contact:
I agree with almost everything neikeel suggests. I've rebuilt my -83 Marshall JMP 1987 to a ptp.
I dont't know how you are going to build, designing your own board? But go for a 1987. It's a little bit easier to convert it to 1986 spec if you want to, than the other way (from 1998 to 1987). But i also depends on the sound you want to get (I'm a little bit freaked about the 1987 circuit).
I started with four single 47uF filter caps mounted on the board. Let the first cap can remain as it was, double 50uF. (I don't understand why Marshall put the second cap can so far away from the PI. long cabels across the chassi and cloose to the high ac voltage area - a source for hum.) But I felt the sound was to stiff with the 47uF. So I changed. First lowered to 32uF and then to double 16uF (in parallell, 32uF) in the preamp! That's the sound I like! Much better response and feel (my taste).
I prefer the 56k sloperesistor, not 33k. I use it in all my Marshalls, even my modified 6100
But in the JMP I use a 56k/390pF combination, to get a little bit more aggressive in the treble freqs. Just a matter of taste.
I don't like 0,1uF after PI at all. I often use 0,047. In some cases 0,022 will do better, a little bit tighter bass. But it also depends on what power tubes you choose (and probably the OT - I use the nice Marstran). When I use my Mullard xf2 I can push them with much more bass freqs and still the bass is tight.
Here's a pic from the mounted board (before I changed to double 16uF).
Good luck! / G

EDIT: A component you didn't mention is the B+ resistor after the choke. The platevoltage to PI and the preamp is very important for the feel and sound of your amp. Some JMP:s use 22k after the choke (ore double 10k). You should try what's best for you. If you lower it to for example 10k or even lower the preamp might clean up a bit , raising the value can make the sound a little bit more brown
I dont't know how you are going to build, designing your own board? But go for a 1987. It's a little bit easier to convert it to 1986 spec if you want to, than the other way (from 1998 to 1987). But i also depends on the sound you want to get (I'm a little bit freaked about the 1987 circuit).
I started with four single 47uF filter caps mounted on the board. Let the first cap can remain as it was, double 50uF. (I don't understand why Marshall put the second cap can so far away from the PI. long cabels across the chassi and cloose to the high ac voltage area - a source for hum.) But I felt the sound was to stiff with the 47uF. So I changed. First lowered to 32uF and then to double 16uF (in parallell, 32uF) in the preamp! That's the sound I like! Much better response and feel (my taste).
I prefer the 56k sloperesistor, not 33k. I use it in all my Marshalls, even my modified 6100

I don't like 0,1uF after PI at all. I often use 0,047. In some cases 0,022 will do better, a little bit tighter bass. But it also depends on what power tubes you choose (and probably the OT - I use the nice Marstran). When I use my Mullard xf2 I can push them with much more bass freqs and still the bass is tight.
Here's a pic from the mounted board (before I changed to double 16uF).
Good luck! / G

EDIT: A component you didn't mention is the B+ resistor after the choke. The platevoltage to PI and the preamp is very important for the feel and sound of your amp. Some JMP:s use 22k after the choke (ore double 10k). You should try what's best for you. If you lower it to for example 10k or even lower the preamp might clean up a bit , raising the value can make the sound a little bit more brown

- Freebird
- Senior Member
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Thanks Gunner! Your recommendations are very informative. I don't know yet whether I will create my own PTP board or take George's 50 watt lead board, because as you mentioned the caps. I have to reconsider if I'd like to have preamp filtering cap on board or inside at chassis wall like in JTM45. Also details on B+ resistors is a good point I have to think over. So I don't want to hurry up but rather I take the time to find a proper specification.
What I already defined is to use split cathode circuit. So I will go for a 1987 with some variations.
Does anybody know, where I could get a PTP board with turrets, which already has the space for preamp filtering?
Your board looks pretty great. You did nice work.
Daniel
What I already defined is to use split cathode circuit. So I will go for a 1987 with some variations.
Does anybody know, where I could get a PTP board with turrets, which already has the space for preamp filtering?
Your board looks pretty great. You did nice work.
Daniel
- Freebird
- Senior Member
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact:
Hello there/here!
I'd like to know, which position you do recommend for preamp filtering caps to get least hum:
a) one single cab on board and one dual cap (only half needed) inside the chassis near PT
b) dual cap on top of the chassis near choke
c) dual cap inside the chassis near PT
Thanks in advance for any recommendations or advices!
Daniel
I'd like to know, which position you do recommend for preamp filtering caps to get least hum:
a) one single cab on board and one dual cap (only half needed) inside the chassis near PT
b) dual cap on top of the chassis near choke
c) dual cap inside the chassis near PT
Thanks in advance for any recommendations or advices!
Daniel
- Freebird
- Senior Member
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:36 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 13492
- Location: Switzerland
- Contact: