David Bray, Metro amp mod sound clip
Moderator: VelvetGeorge
- rockstah
- Senior Member
- Posts: 12481
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Austin Texas
how come no one has asked about which master volume this is? did he change it into jcm 800 ?
show a chassis shot already... sheesh
show a chassis shot already... sheesh
Last edited by rockstah on Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:57 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
When we were discussing the sound that I was looking for, I was referencing some clips on his site. Those clips had both channels pegged, so I can only assume this recording was done the same way. I should have more info when the amp is returned to me in a week or so.rockstah wrote:how come no one has asked about which master volume this is? did he change it into jcm 800 ?
- rockstah
- Senior Member
- Posts: 12481
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:28 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Austin Texas
nice!swissross wrote:When we were discussing the sound that I was looking for, I was referencing some clips on his site. Those clips had both channels pegged, so I can only assume this recording was done the same way. I should have more info when the amp is returned to me in a week or so.rockstah wrote:how come no one has asked about which master volume this is? did he change it into jcm 800 ?
- Lou
- Senior Member
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 9:07 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Keep us posted swiss!!!
Lou
Toronto Canada
Metro 1959 X 2; Metro 1987 x 2 ; Metro JTM45; Metro '68 12xxx x 2;Metro 412 Slant 12M Heritage
1980 Gibson Heritage Elite WCR Pickups; 1980 JVSquire Strat; G&L Legacy ; Metro 412 Slant G12M Heritage
www.houseofnot.com
Toronto Canada
Metro 1959 X 2; Metro 1987 x 2 ; Metro JTM45; Metro '68 12xxx x 2;Metro 412 Slant 12M Heritage
1980 Gibson Heritage Elite WCR Pickups; 1980 JVSquire Strat; G&L Legacy ; Metro 412 Slant G12M Heritage
www.houseofnot.com
-
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:57 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
Sorry fellas, this is going to have to be kept to myself. Just wanted to update you in case someone was waiting for more information. David asks all clients to keep his modifications confidential and not distribute photographs or schematics as they are proprietary. I'm sure you can understand. If this was something that I had done myself I would have no problem with it, but because this is the work of someone who has spent years perfecting their art and has a business doing these modifications, I hope you can see, as I do, why he doesn't want his work to be freely distributed on the internet.
Sounds awesome though... Very very sweet.
Sounds awesome though... Very very sweet.
- novosibir
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4654
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:32 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Nuernberg, Germany
- Contact:
This I can very very good understandswissross wrote:Sorry fellas ..... but because this is the work of someone who has spent years perfecting their art and has a business doing these modifications, I hope you can see, as I do, why he doesn't want his work to be freely distributed on the internet.

And this we've already heared. Yep! Great sound!swissross wrote:Sounds awesome though... Very very sweet.

Larry
The fault almost always is sitting in front of the amp 
Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery

Larry's Website now with included Pix's Gallery
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:53 pm
Got the amp back yet ?
Its to bad we cann't take a peek inside or a description of whats been done, but thats undertandable as to why.
(kinda glad, as it would be awfull not to be able to keep on tweeking as I've only just started , but the amp sure did sound nice)
Hows the tone now, if youve got the amp back?
Maybe post sopme of your own clips if possable so they can be compared to Davids clips that you previously posted.
Cheers & enjoy
Its to bad we cann't take a peek inside or a description of whats been done, but thats undertandable as to why.
(kinda glad, as it would be awfull not to be able to keep on tweeking as I've only just started , but the amp sure did sound nice)
Hows the tone now, if youve got the amp back?
Maybe post sopme of your own clips if possable so they can be compared to Davids clips that you previously posted.
Cheers & enjoy
-
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:57 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
Actually without getting into much detail, yes. But as with anyone who has built one of these kits it's easy to see what has changed from the original circuit and what kinds of parts were used for the modifications. It's quite interesting really. The parts that were masked could be 'reverse engineered' with some good electrical equipment (which I just happen to have a couple benches full of), but I'm more interested in playing the amp at this point that figuring that out. If something breaks and I have to start fixing things, then I might start looking into it more than I have currently.robert wrote:Hi swissross,
I understand... does he use the same kind of goop that Howard Dumble had used to hide his circuit secrets?![]()
Just kidding...
Robert
But I gotta say, if anyone wants to modify their Metroamp kit, it's expensive but well worth the investment, and I think that investment is the key word. I'll never get rid of this amp and it sounds so unbelievably good now. I shelved all of my effects except my Holier Grail reverb and an old MXR 10 band EQ that I use through a bypass box. Couldn't be happier.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:57 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
It sounds unbelieveable. A friend was supposed to come over today with a Shure SM57 and a mic stand but I can't get ahold of him. As soon as I get that, I'll be sure to post some clips from my own gear.pongo316 wrote:Got the amp back yet ?
Hows the tone now, if youve got the amp back?
Maybe post sopme of your own clips if possable so they can be compared to Davids clips that you previously posted.
Cheers & enjoy
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 3:53 pm
swissross
Now you got me thinking if I should maybe send mine over but I'm In Australia might be a bit expencive.
But it sure sounds like it would be worth it.
Good to see your happy with it sounderd like a keeper from the start.Actually without getting into much detail, yes. But as with anyone who has built one of these kits it's easy to see what has changed from the original circuit and what kinds of parts were used for the modifications. It's quite interesting really. The parts that were masked could be 'reverse engineered' with some good electrical equipment (which I just happen to have a couple benches full of), but I'm more interested in playing the amp at this point that figuring that out. If something breaks and I have to start fixing things, then I might start looking into it more than I have currently.
But I gotta say, if anyone wants to modify their Metroamp kit, it's expensive but well worth the investment, and I think that investment is the key word. I'll never get rid of this amp and it sounds so unbelievably good now. I shelved all of my effects except my Holier Grail reverb and an old MXR 10 band EQ that I use through a bypass box. Couldn't be happier.
Now you got me thinking if I should maybe send mine over but I'm In Australia might be a bit expencive.
But it sure sounds like it would be worth it.
- wdelaney72
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:04 pm
- Location: Chicago Suburbs
You are paying for him to perform these modifications, right? Most of us on this board have been through this debate with the big secret Caswell mod. I find this to be a very short-sighted business model. Sharing the design would do nothing but increase the interest in his work. With that, his name gets attached to the mod, and no matter how many people copy his design, he still has his name on the mod and that many more people will want HIM to do it. But, it's his business and he can run it whatever way he wants. I think he's losing out.swissross wrote:Sorry fellas, this is going to have to be kept to myself. Just wanted to update you in case someone was waiting for more information. David asks all clients to keep his modifications confidential and not distribute photographs or schematics as they are proprietary. I'm sure you can understand. If this was something that I had done myself I would have no problem with it, but because this is the work of someone who has spent years perfecting their art and has a business doing these modifications, I hope you can see, as I do, why he doesn't want his work to be freely distributed on the internet.
Sounds awesome though... Very very sweet.
You obviously have the right to respect his wishes, but if you pay for him to work on your amp, you should be able to freely do whatever the hell you want with it.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 7:57 pm
- Just the numbers in order: 7
- Location: Dayton, Ohio
It was a request not a demand, and I'll honor his request. Same thing I would do for you if you had done the mod for me and didn't want the information to be made public. Simple as that.You obviously have the right to respect his wishes, but if you pay for him to work on your amp, you should be able to freely do whatever the hell you want with it